In an interview with The Minnesota Independent, Jeff Sharlet uses her association with the Assemblies of God to paint Sarah Palin as a militant Theocrat.
They actually don’t think they’re theocratic. And they have a way of getting out of that: Theocratic would be if I was a clergy person and sat down and studied the Bible and said, Okay, I’m going to pass this law because in my wisdom, I have seen this in the Bible.I hope my man Barack Obama, as a man of faith, a man of prayer, would also listen to God. Does that make a person crazy or a theocrat? Does that mean that one has to be militant and intolerant?
That’s not what they do. They turn themselves over to the spirit. The movement she’s a part of is really holy ghost-powered. What they say is, they’re just being a vessel. A term that a wonky theologian might use is “theo-centric.”
Apparently the Assemblies of God is getting a lot of press off of Palin. From the way the A/G is portrayed I wonder 'am I'm in the same church?' I happen to be an Assemblies of God pastor and a democrat supporting Obama. How does that fit the caricature painted in the media? Rich Tatum wrote an introduction to the Assemblies of God for Christianity Today to answer some of the media imprecations.
democrats.com show a video clip from Sarah Palin speaking at a Master's Commission service. Master's Commission is a discipleship program for college age kids to give hands on training for ministry. democrats.com then applies this quote:
If you read the Vision statement (under About), you'll see:The website that they reference is not the Assemblies of God Master's Commission but a different discipleship program from Christ Church Kirkland. They seem to have a very different theology. I hope that the wording in their vision statement is simply unfortunate.To see young men be men who are not afraid to lead and are violent in their pursuit of righteousnessWhat exactly does that mean? What kind of violence are the young men being trained and encouraged to engage in?
Are voices like Sharlet and the "aggressive progressives" at democrats.com right? Is there much to fear?
Perhaps there is some temptation.
We would like things to line up with the Bible, wouldn't we? The temptation is to make the laws of the land the same as the laws of God for living. To make the holy life the only legal life. The religious right is already advocating moral legislation like this. What would it look like taken to the extreme?
Last night Elaine and I watch V for Vendetta. Would the world in which the characters live be what we Christians would create? Would the Koran be banned, owning one a criminal offense? Would homosexuality be made illegal? Would homosexuals be rounded up, imprisoned or killed? What of Justice and Mercy?
Oh God, save us from our distorted view of righteousness. Your ways are higher than our ways, your thoughts are greater. Only you can rule in righteousness with out corruption. Help we, who are progressive, to love mercy even more than change. Help we, who are Christians, to keep love before all else.
Yikes! I hope that would not be the kind of world Christians make, but anything done to the extreme is likely to turn nasty. We just keep praying, I guess. I'm reading a great book about a girl whose dad dies and then she questions her faith. Her faith is pushed by her mother and her mother refused to have a funeral for her father (they had recently divorced) because he was a member of her elite (only true) church. Now the girl wants none of it, but she is being introduced to a more mainline church and she is beginning to enjoy God. The book is Converting Kate by Beckie Weinheimer. I highly recommend it.
ReplyDeleteI meant that she wouldn't have a funeral for her husband because he WASN'T part of her church. Sorry!
ReplyDelete